Upcoming event

Using Competing Risk of Mortality to Inform the Transition from Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance to Watchful Waiting

  • Mitchell M Huang 1,
  • Ridwan Alam 1,
  • Andrew T Gabrielson 1,
  • Zhuo T Su 1,
  • Borna Kassiri,
  • Sean A Fletcher 1,
  • Michael J Biles 1,
  • Hiten D Patel 1,
  • Christian P Pavlovich 1,
  • Zeyad R Schwen 2
1 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 2 Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, USA

Background

For men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa), disease progression and age-related changes in health may influence decisions about pursuing curative treatment.

Objective

To evaluate the predicted PCa and non-PCa mortality at the time of reclassification among men on AS, to identify clinical criteria for considering a transition from AS to watchful waiting (WW).

Design, setting, and participants

Patients enrolled in a large AS program who experienced biopsy grade reclassification (Gleason grade increase) were retrospectively examined. All patients who had complete documentation of medical comorbidities at reclassification were included.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

A validated model was used to assess 10- and 15-yr untreated PCa and non-PCa mortalities based on patient comorbidities and PCa clinical characteristics. We compared the ratio of predicted PCa mortality with predicted non-PCa mortality (“predicted mortality ratio”) and divided patients into four risk tiers based on this ratio: (1) tier 1 (ratio: >0.33), (2) tier 2 (ratio 0.33–0.20), (3) tier 3 (ratio 0.20–0.10), and (4) tier 4 (ratio <0.10).

Results and limitations

Of the 344 men who were reclassified, 98 (28%) were in risk tier 1, 85 (25%) in tier 2, 93 (27%) in tier 3, and 68 (20%) in tier 4 for 10-yr mortality. Fifteen-year risk tiers were distributed similarly. The 23 (6.7%) men who met the “transition triad” (age >75 yr, Charlson Comorbidity Index >3, and grade group ≤2) had a 14-fold higher non-PCa mortality risk and a lower predicted mortality ratio than those who did not (0.07 vs 0.23, p < 0.001). The primary limitations of our study included its retrospective nature and the use of predicted mortalities.

Conclusions

At reclassification, nearly half of patients had a more than five-fold and one in five patients had a more than ten-fold higher risk of non-PCa death than patients having a risk of untreated PCa death. Despite a more significant cancer diagnosis, a transition to WW for older men with multiple comorbidities and grade group <3 PCa should be considered.