Purpose
Men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer do not receive all the recommended testing. Reasons for variation in receipt are unknown.
Methods
We combined prospective registry data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, a collaborative of 46 academic and community urology practices across Michigan, with insurance claims from 2014-2018 for men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer. We defined receipt of recommended surveillance according to the Collaborative’s low-intensity criteria as: annual prostate-specific antigen testing, and either magnetic resonance imaging or prostate biopsy every 3 years. We assessed receipt of recommended surveillance among men with ≥36 months of follow-up (N=246). We conducted multilevel analyses to examine the influence of the urologist, urologist and primary care provider visits, and patient demographic and clinical factors on variation in receipt.
Results
During 3 years of active surveillance, just over half of men (56.5%) received all recommended surveillance testing (69.9% annual prostate-specific antigen testing, 72.8% magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy). We found 19% of the variation in receipt was attributed to individual urologists. While increasing provider visits were not significantly associated with receipt, older men were less likely to receive magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy (≥75 versus <55 years, adjusted odds ratio 0.07; 95% Confidence Interval 0.01-0.81).
Conclusions
Nearly half of men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer did not receive all recommended surveillance. While urologists substantially influenced receipt of recommended testing, exploring how to leverage patients and their visits with their primary care providers to positively influence receipt appears warranted.