Upcoming event

Why does MRI-targeted biopsy miss clinically significant cancer?

  • Michael A Daneshvar,
  • Christian Hague,
  • Andrew R. Wilbur,
  • Patrick T. Gomella,
  • Joanna Shih,
  • Nabila Khondakar,
  • Nitin Yerram,
  • Sherif Mehralivand,
  • Sandeep Gurram,
  • Minhaj Siddiqui,
  • Paul Pinsky,
  • Howard Parnes,
  • Maria Merino,
  • Bradford Wood,
  • Baris Turkbey,
  • Peter A. Pinto

Publication: Journal of Urology, August 2021

Purpose

Multiple studies demonstrate MRI-targeted biopsy detects more clinically significant cancer than systematic biopsy, however some clinically significant cancers are detected by systematic biopsy only. While these events are rare, we sought to perform a retrospective analysis of these cases to ascertain the reasons that MRI-targeted biopsy missed clinically significant cancer, which was subsequently detected on systematic prostate biopsy.

Methods

Patients were enrolled in a prospective study comparing cancer detection rates by transrectal MRI-targeted fusion biopsy and systematic 12-core biopsy. Patients with an elevated PSA, abnormal digital rectal exam, or imaging findings concerning for prostate cancer underwent prostate MRI and subsequent MRI-targeted and systematic biopsy in the same setting. The subset of patients with grade group (GG) ≥3 cancer found on systematic biopsy and GG≤2 cancer (or no cancer) on MRI-targeted biopsy were classified as MRI-targeted biopsy misses. A retrospective analysis of the MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy real-time screen captures determined the cause of MRI-targeted biopsy miss. Multivariable logistic regression analysis compared baseline characteristics of patients with MRI-targeted biopsy misses to GG-matched patients whose clinically significant cancer was detected by MRI-targeted biopsy.

Results

Over the study period of 2007 to 2019, 2103 patients met study inclusion criteria and underwent combined MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsies. 41 (1.9%) men were classified as MRI-targeted biopsy misses. Most MRI-targeted biopsy misses were due to errors in lesion targeting (n=21, 51.2%), followed by MRI-invisible lesions (n=17, 40.5%), and MRI lesions missed by the radiologist (n=3, 7.1%). On logistic regression analysis, lower PI-RADS score was associated with having clinically significant cancer missed on MRI-targeted biopsy.

Conclusion

While uncommon, most MRI-targeted biopsy misses are due to errors in lesions targeting, which highlights the importance of accurate co-registration and targeting when using software-based fusion platforms. Additionally, some patients will harbor MRI-invisible lesions which are un-targetable by MRI-targeted platforms. The presence of a low PI-RADS score despite a high PSA is suggestive of harboring an MRI-invisible lesion.