Upcoming event

Randomised phase III trial of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiation therapy with or without enzalutamide for high risk, clinically localised prostate cancer: ENZARAD (ANZUP 1303)

  • Paul L. Nguyen,
  • Christopher Sweeney,
  • Hayley Thomas,
  • Blossom Mak,
  • Alison Zhang,
  • Tee Sin Lim,
  • Chakiath C. Jose,
  • Jarad Martin,
  • Nitya Patanjali,
  • David Pryor,
  • Phuong Tran,
  • Stephen Mangar,
  • Alina M. Mihai,
  • Mark Beresford,
  • Felix Sedlmayer,
  • Paul J. Kelly,
  • Simon Hughes,
  • Ian D. Davis,
  • Scott Williams

Publication: ESMO25, October 2025

Background

We evaluated the effects of adding enzalutamide (ENZA) to standard adjuvant ADT with radiation therapy (RT) for high-risk, localised or locally-advanced prostate cancer (L/LAPC).

Methods

Participants (pts) having 24mo ADT and RT for high-risk L/LAPC were randomized to ENZA 160mg daily for 24 mo vs a non-steroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) for 6 mo with stratification across 7 clinico-pathological factors. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) on conventional imaging (ICECaP) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included OS, PC-specific survival (PCSS), PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical-PFS, and adverse events (AE). 200 MFS events provided 80% power assuming a true MFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 and 2-sided alpha of 0.05. Main effects were tested with unstratified logrank p-values. Five subgroups of interest were prespecified and subgroup effects were tested with interaction p-values (i-p).

Results

We enrolled 802 pts from MAR2014 to JUN2018: median age 71; 89% Gleason 8-10; 47% T3-4; 35% PSA≥20; and 11% N1. 207 MFS events occurred during a median follow-up of 92 mo. ENZA and NSAA had similar effects on MFS, OS, and PCSS; ENZA had larger effects on PSA-PFS and clinical-PFS (Table). Effects of ENZA on MFS were larger in 2 of the 5 pre-specified subgroups of interest: clinical N1 (i-p=0.04) and planned pelvic RT (i-p20 ng/mL), Age<70, or by region. The AEs reported for most pts (ENZA vs NSAA) were fatigue (353 vs 321), hot flashes (315 vs 281), and urinary frequency (309 vs 303). Grade 3-5 AEs occurred in 185 pts in each group.

Conclusions

The addition of ENZA to ADT and RT had limited effects on MFS during 8 years of follow-up in high-risk L/LAPC. Effects on MFS were larger in those with positive pelvic nodes on conventional imaging, and in those with pelvic RT planned. Clinical trials information: NCT02446444.

Outcome at 8 years ENZAN=401 NSAAN=401 HR (95% CI) p-value (2-sided)
MFS 74% 72% 0.88 (0.67, 1.15) 0.34
OS 83% 80% 0.87 (0.63, 1.20) 0.40
PCSS 97% 96% 0.90 (0.41, 1.97) 0.79
PSA-PFS 67% 62% 0.78 (0.61, 0.99) 0.04
Clinical-PFS 72% 66% 0.76 (0.59, 0.98) 0.04
MFS at 8 years in 2 of 5 prespecified subgroups of interest (Also stratification factors) Interaction p-values (2-sided)
N1 subgroup 77% (N=46) 50% (N=42) 0.43 (0.20-0.92) 0.04
N0 subgroup 74% (N=355) 75% (N-359) 0.97 (0.72-1.30)
Pelvic RT subgroup 82% (N=162) 65% (N=162) 0.47 (0.29-0.76) <0.001
No pelvic RT subgroup 69% (N=239) 76% (N=239) 1.25 (0.89-1.76)

Clinical trial identification

NCT02446444.