Upcoming event

Association between African American race and clinical outcomes in men treated for low-risk prostate cancer with active surveillance

  • Rishi Deka,
  • P. Travis Courtney,
  • J. Kellogg Parsons,
  • Tyler J. Nelson,
  • Vinit Nalawade,
  • Elaine Luterstein,
  • Daniel R. Cherry,
  • Daniel R. Simpson,
  • Arno J. Mundt,
  • James D. Murphy,
  • Anthony V. D’Amico,
  • Christopher J. Kane,
  • Maria Elena Martinez,
  • Brent S. Rose

Importance

There is concern that African American men with low-risk prostate cancer may harbor more aggressive disease than non-Hispanic White men. Therefore, it is unclear whether active surveillance is a safe option for African American men.

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes of African American and non-Hispanic White men with low-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective cohort study in the US Veterans Health Administration Health Care System of African American and non-Hispanic White men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2015, and managed with active surveillance. The date of final follow-up was March 31, 2020.

Exposures

Active surveillance was defined as no definitive treatment within the first year of diagnosis and at least 1 additional surveillance biopsy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression to at least intermediate-risk, definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer–specific mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Results

The cohort included 8726 men, including 2280 African American men (26.1%) (median age, 63.2 years) and 6446 non-Hispanic White men (73.9%) (median age, 65.5 years), and the median follow-up was 7.6 years (interquartile range, 5.7-9.9; range, 0.2-19.2). Among African American men and non-Hispanic White men, respectively, the 10-year cumulative incidence of disease progression was 59.9% vs 48.3% (difference, 11.6% [95% CI, 9.2% to 13.9%); P < .001); of receipt of definitive treatment, 54.8% vs 41.4% (difference, 13.4% [95% CI, 11.0% to 15.7%]; P < .001); of metastasis, 1.5% vs 1.4% (difference, 0.1% [95% CI, –0.4% to 0.6%]; P = .49); of prostate cancer–specific mortality, 1.1% vs 1.0% (difference, 0.1% [95% CI, –0.4% to 0.6%]; P = .82); and of all-cause mortality, 22.4% vs 23.5% (difference, 1.1% [95% CI, –0.9% to 3.1%]; P = 0.09).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study of men with low-risk prostate cancer followed up for a median of 7.6 years, African American men, compared with non-Hispanic White men, had a statistically significant increased 10-year cumulative incidence of disease progression and definitive treatment, but not metastasis or prostate cancer–specific mortality. Longer-term follow-up is needed to better assess the mortality risk.