Upcoming event

Additional value of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences in multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: data from the PROMIS Study

  • Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily,
  • Elena Frangou,
  • Hashim U. Ahmed,
  • Mark Emberton,
  • Shonit Punwani,
  • Richard Kaplan,
  • Louise C. Brown,
  • Alex Freeman,
  • Charles Jameson,
  • Richard Hindley,
  • Delia Peppercorn,
  • Andrew Thrower,
  • Mathias Winkler,
  • Tara Barwick,
  • Victoria Stewart,
  • Nick Burns-Cox,
  • Paul Burn,
  • Maneesh Ghei,
  • Jeevan Kumaradevan,
  • Raj Prasad,
  • Janice Ash-Miles,
  • Iqbal Shergill,
  • Sanjay Agarwal,
  • Derek Rosario,
  • Ferekh Salim,
  • Simon Bott,
  • Hywel Evans,
  • Alastair Henderson,
  • Sukanya Ghosh,
  • Tim Dudderidge,
  • J. Smart,
  • Ken Tung,
  • Alexander Kirkham,
  • on behalf of the PROMIS Group

Background

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) is established in the diagnosis of prostate cancer, but the need for enhanced sequences has recently been questioned.

Objective

To assess whether dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) improves accuracy over T2 and diffusion sequences.

Design, setting, and participants

PROMIS was a multicentre, multireader trial, with, in this part, 497 biopsy-naïve men undergoing standardised 1.5T MP-MRI using T2, diffusion, and DCE, followed by a detailed transperineal prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy at 5 mm intervals. Likert scores of 1–5 for the presence of a significant tumour were assigned in strict sequence, for (1) T2 + diffusion and then (2) T2 + diffusion + dynamic contrast-enhanced images.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

For the primary analysis, the primary PROMIS outcome measure (Gleason score ≥4 + 3 or ≥6 mm maximum cancer length) on TPM was used, and an MRI score of ≥3 was considered positive.

Results and limitations

Sensitivity without and with DCE was 94% and 95%, specificity 37% and 38%, positive predictive value 51% and 51%, and negative predictive value 90% and 91%, respectively (p > 0.05 in each case). The number of patients avoiding biopsy (scoring 1–2) was similar (123/497 vs 121/497, p = 0.8). The number of equivocal scores (3/5) was slightly higher without DCE (32% vs 28% p = 0.031). The proportion of MRI equivocal (3/5) and positive (4–5) cases showing significant tumours were similar (23% and 71% vs 20% and 69%). No cases of dominant Gleason 4 or higher were missed with DCE, compared with a single case with T2 + diffusion-weighted imaging. No attempt was made to correlate lesion location on MRI and histology, which may be considered a limitation. Radiologists were aware of the patient’s prostate-specific antigen.

Conclusions

Contrast adds little when MP-MRI is used to exclude significant prostate cancer.